ANTenna Blog -- How-To

SAN Vs. NAS: From No Contest To Fair Fight?

Posted by Matthew McKenzie Friday, Nov 20, 2009, 12:03 PM ET

Today, there are still vast differences between NAS and SAN technology. According to one expert, however, that gap may be closing quickly.

Henry Newman is an Enterprise Storage Forum contributor with nearly 30 years of industry experience. He knows that many companies today ask the same questions about NAS versus SAN that they were asking nearly a decade ago. The answers to those questions, however, appear to be in flux:

The following words were written on this site back in 2002, when Drew Bird was writing about the basics of storage area networks (SANs).

"Many IT organizations today are scratching their heads debating whether the advantages of implementing a SAN solution justify the associated costs. Others are trying to get a handle on today's storage options and whether SAN is simply Network Attached Storage spelled backwards."

Truer words could not have been written, and they still ring true today. I am fond of saying that there are no new engineering problems, just new engineers solving old problems. Today SAN and NAS still dominate the market. Many of the tradeoffs are the same, but change is coming.

Newman admits that on the surface, things still look pretty much the same: SAN is far more scalable than NAS in terms of both performance and size; NAS still wins hands-down when it comes to cost and ease of management.

Don't Miss: NEW! Storage How-To Center

Yet some big changes are on the way for NAS technology. File system performance improvements, coupled with the rise of 10GbE networking technology that can outperform Fibre Channel as a much lower cost, will combine to blur the scalability advantages that long distinguished SAN technology.

The upshot, according to Newman: "If you combine NFSv4.1, 10GbE and a scalable NAS file system, the three combined could make SANs a thing of the past. Why would anyone want to use more expensive, more complex technology with less functionality and a more difficult management framework?

"Obviously, the answer is no one."

For companies with existing storage networking infrastructures, this may only matter in the long run. "Convergence" is not shorthand for "fix what ain't broken."

For those considering new storage networking solutions or major upgrades, however, convergence is clearly a game-changing trend. If NAS can close the gap with SAN in terms of performance and scalability, then both will have to compete on cost and complexity. And for now, it looks like NAS still holds the upper hand on both counts.


How-To
Backup | Hardware & Software | IT | Networking & Communications | Storage




This is a public forum. CMP Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. CMP Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of CMP Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in CMP Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




Explore ANTenna Blog
Most Recent Posts
ANTenna Blog Topics
     
     
ANTenna Bloggers
ANTenna Blog Roll


 


Browse by Category

IW SMB Tech
Term Of Day:

Boost your tech
vocabulary!
InformationWeek SMB's
TechEncyclopedia
defines more than
20,000 IT terms.



FREE Technology Services Locator!

Search our database of 200,000 solution- provider locations by business activity, technology, vertical market, and customer size. Find a technology partner NOW.

go